Appendix 2. Reviewer Disclosures

Reviewer	Employment	Research Grant	Other Research Support	Speakers' Bureau/ Honoraria	Expert Witness	Ownership Interest	Consultant/ Advisory Board	Other
Jeffrey M. Berman	UNC Hospitals	None	None	None	None	None	None	None
Aaron W. Calhoun	University of Louisville	None	None	None	None	None	None	None
Maia Dorsett	University of Rochester Medical Center	None	None	None	None	None	None	None
Joyce Foresman-Capuzzi	Lankenau Medical Center	None	None	None	None	None	None	None
Louis P. Halamek	Stanford University	None	None	None	None	None	None	None
Mary Ann McNeil	University of Minnesota	None	None	None	None	None	None	None
Catherine Patocka	University of Calgary (Canada)	None	None	None	None	None	None	None
David L. Rodgers	Penn State	None	None	None	None	None	None	None

This table represents the relationships of reviewers that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be “significant” if (a) the person receives $10 000 or more during any 12-month period, or 5% or more of the person’s gross income; or (b) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the entity, or owns $10 000 or more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be “modest” if it is less than “significant” under the preceding definition.