Part 3: Ethics: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care 

Reviewer Disclosures

Appendix 2. Reviewer Disclosures
Reviewer Employment Research Grant Other Research Support Speakers' Bureau/
Honoraria
Expert Witness Ownership Interest Consultant/
Advisory Board
Other

Keith Couper

University of Warwick (United Kingdom)

National Institute for Health and Care Research and Resuscitation Council UK (Research on cardiac arrest- funding paid to institution)†

None

None

None

None

None

None

Neal W. Dickert

Emory University School of Medicine

Merck (Funding for study of heart failure decision support study)†; Abiomed (RECOVER IV trial [EFIC process])†

None

None

None

None

Abiomed†

None

Stephanie Kukora

Children's Mercy Kansas City

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

Naomi Tricot Laventhal

University of Michigan Medical School

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

Bernard Lo

University of California, San Francisco

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

Thaddeus Mason Pope

Mitchell Hamline School of Law

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

Mypinder Sekhon

University of British Columbia (Canada)

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

This table represents the relationships of reviewers that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be “significant” if (a) the person receives $5,000 or more during any 12-month period, or 5% or more of the person’s gross income; or (b) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the entity, or owns $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be “modest” if it is less than “significant” under the preceding definition.

*Modest.
†Significant.