|Reviewer||Employment||Research Grant||Other Research Support||Speakers' Bureau/
|Expert Witness||Ownership Interest||Consultant/
|Christoph Bührer||Charité University Medical Center (Germany)||None||None||University of Tübingen*||None||None||None||None|
|Praveen Chandrasekharan||SUNY Buffalo||None||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Krithika Lingappan||Baylor College of Medicine||None||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Ju-Lee Oei||Royal Hospital for Women (Australia)||None||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Birju A. Shah||The University of Oklahoma||None||None||None||None||None||None||None|
This table represents the relationships of reviewers that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be “significant” if (a) the person receives $10000 or more during any 12-month period, or 5% or more of the person’s gross income; or (b) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the entity, or owns $10000 or more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be “modest” if it is less than “significant” under the preceding definition.